Description
Report copyright infringement
by
James H. Hallas (Author)
On May 12, 1945, the 6th Marine Division was nearing Naha, capital of Okinawa. To the division’s front lay a low, loaf-shaped hill. It looked no different from other hills seized with relative ease over the past few days. But this hill, soon to be dubbed, Sugar Loaf, was very different indeed. Part of a complex of three hills, Sugar Loaf formed the western anchor of General Mitsuru Ushijima’s Shuri Line, which stretched from coast to coast across the island. Sugar Loaf was critical to the defense of that line, preventing U.S. forces from turning the Japanese flank. Over the next week, the Marines made repeated attacks on the hill losing thousands of men to death, wounds, and combat fatigue. Not until May 18 was Sugar Loaf finally seized. Two days later, the Japanese mounted a battalion-sized counterattack in an effort to regain their lost position, but the Marines held.
Ironically, these losses may not have been necessary. General Lemuel Shepherd, Jr., had argued for an amphibious assault to the rear of the Japanese defense line, but his proposal was rejected by U.S. Tenth Army Commander General Simon Bolivar Buckner. That refusal led to a controversy that has continued to this day.
Back Jacket
On May 12, 1945, the 6th Marine Division was nearing Naha, capital of Okinawa. A loaf-shaped hill, soon to be dubbed ‘Sugar Loaf” was critical to the defense of that line, preventing U.S. forces from turning Japanese flank. Thousands of men were lost due to deaths, wounds and combat fatigue. Ironically, these losses may not have been necessary. The decisions of Army personnel at Sugar Loaf led to a controversy which has continued today.
Author Biography
JAMES H. HALLAS is publisher of the Glastonbury Citizen, a newspaper in Glastonbury, Connecticut. He has published articles in American History Illustrated and Yankee Magazine. He has written two books, Squandered Victory: The American First Army at St. Mihiel (Praeger, 1995) and Devil’s Anvil: The Assault on Peleliu (Praeger, 1994).
Number of Pages: 272Dimensions: 0.98 x 9.36 x 6.18 INPublication Date: March 11, 1996
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.